Lorenzo Sonego vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Jul at 03:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Sonego vs B. Nakashima

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sonego 2 - 0 Nakashima
They have played 7 sets in total, with Lorenzo Sonego winning 5 and Brandon Nakashima winning 2. The last match between Lorenzo Sonego and Brandon Nakashima was at the Wimbledon - London, 05-07-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-6(8) 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sonego | 2 |
| Nakashima | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R3) Wimbledon - London(07-05-25)
(R1) Hong Kong Tennis Open - Hong Kong(12-30-24)
L. Sonego vs B. Nakashima H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,399,220 | Career Prize Money | $3,667,225 |
| 55.29% (392-317) | Career Total W/L | 60.37% (259-170) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 8 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 46.30% (25-29) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.46% (32-29) |
L. Sonego vs B. Nakashima Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Nakashima edges out with a recent win rate of 47.96% on his second serve, slightly higher than Sonego's 47.25%. Could this give him an advantage in maintaining service games?
- Return Game Stats: Despite Nakashima winning 42.5% of opponents' second serve points lately, Sonego has a minimal lead with 42.66%. On first serve returns, both are nearly identical—Nakashima at 23.03% and Sonego at 22.96%. How important will these marginal differences be?
- Under Pressure: While Nakashima has saved 57.24% of breakpoints, Sonego shows resilience with a 60.61% saving rate. Will this make a difference in crucial game moments?
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Nakashima has a stronger win record of 55.56% compared to Sonego's 48.08%. Can Nakashima maintain this form?
- Surface Preferences: Nakashima excels on indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate, whereas Sonego prefers clay with a 59% win rate. With the upcoming match on a hard surface, does Nakashima have an edge?
- Player Level: Nakashima won 51.35% of main tour matches lately, while Sonego's success rate is slightly lower at 46.43%. Could this translate into a competitive advantage for Nakashima?
- Direct Head-to-Head: In their previous encounter, Sonego triumphed over Nakashima in straight sets. Will historical performance repeat itself?
- Deciding Sets: Nakashima has a slight edge, winning 50% of deciding sets versus Sonego's 44% in the past 12 months. Will endurance play a role if the match goes the distance?
- Break Point Conversion: Nakashima is more effective, converting 34.72% of break opportunities compared to Sonego's 29.06%. Could this be decisive during key points?
- Opponent Quality: Nakashima has competed against slightly lower-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 80.58 vs. Sonego's 75.88. Does this reflect differently on their experience and preparedness?
Editorial Prediction (July 5, 2025, UTC):
Both players enter the match with comparable recent second serve and return game stats, though Nakashima exhibits a slight edge in maintaining service game advantages. The players' ability to capitalize on breakpoints could prove pivotal, with Nakashima displaying superior conversion rates.
Under pressure, Sonego demonstrates stronger breakpoint defense, which might be a key factor in the match. Historical encounters lean toward Sonego, following his previous victory. However, Nakashima’s steady performance on hard courts, coupled with his recent higher match win rate, positions him as a strong contender.
Considering all factors, while Nakashima holds a slight statistical edge in several areas, Sonego's past head-to-head success cannot be discounted. Nevertheless, Nakashima's current form and efficient breakpoint conversion rates suggest he is more likely to win the upcoming match.
Lorenzo Sonego vs Brandon Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Sonego vs B. Nakashima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 43 | Games Won | 40 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 22 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 3:17:29 | Average Match Time | 3:17:29 |
| 73% (181/249) | 1st Serve % | 72% (184/255) |
| 75% (135/181) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (139/184) |
| 69% (47/68) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (42/71) |
| 21% (3/14) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 29% (74/255) | Return Points Win % | 27% (67/249) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Sonego Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R3 | L | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||

L. Sonego vs B. Nakashima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.29% (392/317) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.37% (259/170) |
| 54.81% (962/793) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.66% (623/439) |
| 51.97% (8922/8244) | Games Win/Loss | 52.93% (5576/4959) |
| 48.02% (85/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.48% (127/83) |
| 59.01% (203/141) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (35/35) |
| 55.88% (76/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.00% (67/33) |
| 53.85% (28/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 61.22% (30/19) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 3436 | Aces Total | 2971 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1312 | Total Double Faults | 711 |
| 1:39:55 | Average Match Time | 1:46:48 |
| 394.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.25 |
| 65% (30529/47123) | 1st Serve % | 64% (20242/31697) |
| 72% (21993/30529) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (15063/20242) |
| 52% (8551/16591) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (6180/11455) |
| 40% (1596/3972) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1023/2729) |
| 37% (17224/47033) | Return Points Win % | 37% (12113/32928) |
| 55.41% (41/33) | Slam W/L | 48.89% (22/23) |
| 45.54% (46/55) | Masters W/L | 46.97% (31/35) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (3/0) |
| 48.62% (106/112) | Main Tour W/L | 58.86% (93/65) |
| 59.67% (108/73) | Challenger W/L | 69.40% (93/41) |
| 67.74% (84/40) | Futures W/L | 73.91% (17/6) |
| 56% (358/644) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (229/379) |
| 51% (32/63) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 51% (155/302) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (135/248) |
| 46% (111/240) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/135) |
| 82% (401/328) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (261/223) |
| 18% (401/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (261/38) |
| 21% (308/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (167/34) |